It’s simple; we want to reduce the public health impact of our products.
We know tobacco products pose real and serious health risks and the only way to avoid these risks is not to use them. But many adults choose to smoke, so the Group’s top priority continues to be working towards reducing these risks and making available a range of less risky tobacco and nicotine-based alternatives.
In the world of public health, harm reduction is about developing policies to try and minimise the negative health impact of a risky activity without stopping it entirely.
For example, advocating the use of condoms reduces the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. For tobacco, this means offering less risky alternatives to regular cigarettes for those smokers who cannot, or choose not to, give up.
E-cigarettes around 95% less harmful than tobacco estimates landmark review."
McNeill, A., Brose, L. S., Calder, R., Hitchman, S. C., Hajek, P., & McRobbie, H. (2015). E-cigarettes: an evidence update. Public Health England.
The idea of tobacco harm reduction is not a new one. We’ve long promoted snus, a type of low toxicant oral tobacco, which is a proven reduced risk product – but it lacks wide consumer appeal and availability globally. So it’s only relatively recently – with the rise in popularity of e-cigarettes – that harm reduction has moved from a concept to a global reality.
An increasing number in the scientific and public health community are now advocating harm reduction as the way forward for helping the 1.3 billion people worldwide who continue to smoke despite the known health risks.
In practice, this could mean that as well as traditional ‘stop smoking’ health services, smokers who’ve been unable to quit are encouraged to switch to less risky products.
However, currently only a few governments actively support this approach. There are some public health experts and organisations with concerns that not enough is known yet about the health risks of e-cigarettes and that they could undermine efforts to denormalise tobacco use. They are also suspicious of the tobacco industry’s involvement in tobacco harm reduction. For example, the World Health Organisation (WHO) recently stated that the industry “can never be considered to be a legitimate public health partner or stakeholder.” 
Today, we offer adult smokers a range of products – from traditional cigarettes right through to less risky alternatives, such as e-cigarettes. We believe there are credible less risky alternatives to conventional cigarettes to address the public health impact of smoking.
We’ve spent decades researching how to create less risky products and we believe now the technology is right and we can now offer a satisfying quality less risky alternative to traditional cigarettes for those adult smokers who want more choice.
That’s why we’re offering adult smokers a choice of quality products that will really work, including Vype, an electronic cigarette we launched in 2013, a nicotine inhalation product being prepared for launch in the UK, as well as innovative tobacco heating devices.
We’re working with scientists and regulators to promote this next generation of products and advocate a regulatory approach that puts consumer safety and product quality first, while encouraging the growth of new less risky nicotine products that could help smokers cut down or quit.
We are committed to exemplary corporate conduct and transparency across the whole business – this includes our research and development.
We understand that some people are sceptical about research conducted and funded by the tobacco industry, but we know it’s our responsibility to contribute to the science of tobacco harm reduction.
We have state-of-the-art R&D facilities and hundreds of scientists covering many different disciplines, and we work in collaboration with external researchers around the world, such as in the USA, Canada, Spain, Germany, China and Russia.
We understand that harm reduction is a contentious topic where opinion is often divided, and that some people are sceptical about our motivations.
We hope that our actions will demonstrate our continued commitment to harm reduction and that governments will carefully consider the potential benefits it can bring as part of a progressive approach to public health policy.
 Electronic nicotine delivery systems, a report by the WHO, July 2014.